Singaporean sentenced for sexually exploiting, filming, and extorting a 16-year-old girl after online arrangement collapsed.
A 27-year-old Singaporean, Marc Justine Landrio Chandramohan, was sentenced on Monday, June 2, 2025, to two years, 11 months, and 10 weeks in jail, along with three strokes of the cane, after being convicted of sexually exploiting and extorting a 16-year-old girl who had backed out of a “sugar daddy” arrangement. The case, which has gripped Singapore, highlights the dangers of online exploitation and the severe legal consequences for those who prey on vulnerable youth.
Predatory Behavior and Victim Impact
Chandramohan’s crimes began in July 2021, when he contacted the victim via Instagram, proposing to pay her S$900 (approximately US$700) for sexual favors. The girl, initially agreeing, sent him four photos in various states of undress and a video of herself removing her school uniform at his instruction. Chandramohan transferred S$100 to her, but the next day, the victim regretted her decision, informed him she wanted to withdraw, deleted their chat, and blocked him
Undeterred, Chandramohan harassed her for the return of the S$100, creating new Instagram accounts to contact her and threatening legal action. Even after a friend repaid the sum on her behalf, he continued to pressure her for sexual favors and falsely claimed ongoing legal proceedings, eventually coercing her into a sexual act in early 2022. He later demanded S$1,350, allegedly for legal fees, and suggested resuming the arrangement. The victim, feeling isolated and distressed, eventually confided in friends who urged her to report the matter to the police.
Court Proceedings and Sentencing
Chandramohan pleaded guilty to seven charges, including communicating with a minor to obtain commercial sex, abetting the distribution of obscene images and videos, extortion, cheating, making obscene films, and abetting unauthorized access to a computer function. Another nine charges, mostly related to making obscene films, were taken into consideration during sentencing
Principal District Judge Victor Yeo Khee Eng, in his sentencing remarks, condemned Chandramohan’s “premeditated and predatory behaviour,” emphasizing the severe emotional and psychological toll on the victim. She reported feeling “dirty,” became sensitive to physical touch, and experienced panic attacks when encountering someone resembling Chandramohan. The judge highlighted deterrence as the primary sentencing consideration, both for Chandramohan and for potential offenders
Additional Offences and Financial Penalties
In a separate incident in 2023, Chandramohan opened a Standard Chartered bank account at a friend’s request, relinquishing control in exchange for S$330. The account was used for transactions totaling over S$304,000, leading to an additional fine of S$330 as part of his sentence
Legal Framework and Broader Implications
Singapore’s laws on extortion and sexual exploitation of minors are stringent. Extortion carries a jail term of two to seven years with caning, while communicating with a minor for sexual services can result in up to two years’ imprisonment, a fine, or both. The case underscores the importance of digital safety for youth and the need for vigilance among parents and guardians.
This high-profile case serves as a sobering reminder of the dangers lurking in online interactions and the devastating consequences for victims of sexual exploitation and extortion. For both Indonesians and Singaporeans, it highlights the urgent need for education, awareness, and strong legal protections to safeguard youth in the digital age.
Sources: CNA (2025) , The Print (2025)
Keywords: Singapore, Jail, Caning, Extortion, Sugar Daddy, Teen Victim, Court Case
