Prosecutors allege corruption reduced feed quality, leaving zoo animals undernourished.
Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office has named the former president director of Surabaya Zoo as a corruption suspect in connection with an alleged Rp10.2 billion (approx. SGD 816,000) animal feed procurement scheme that reportedly affected the welfare of the zoo’s animals.
Former Zoo Director Becomes Suspect
The Attorney General’s Office has named the former president director of Surabaya Zoo (KBS) as a suspect in an alleged corruption case involving animal feed procurement. Investigators estimate the scheme caused state losses of Rp10.2 billion (approx. SGD 816,000) during the suspect’s tenure.
Feed Procurement Allegedly Manipulated
According to investigators, funds allocated for purchasing animal feed were allegedly manipulated through irregular procurement practices. Authorities believe the scheme resulted in feed that did not meet the required quality and quantity standards, despite the substantial budget allocated for animal care.
Animals Reportedly Suffered
Prosecutors said the alleged corruption had a direct impact on animal welfare, with several animals reportedly becoming noticeably thinner due to inadequate nutrition. The case has attracted widespread public attention because the alleged misconduct not only caused financial losses but also affected the health and well-being of animals under the zoo’s protection.
Investigation Still Ongoing
The Attorney General’s Office is continuing its investigation to determine whether additional suspects were involved in the procurement process. Investigators are reviewing financial records, procurement documents, and witness testimony to establish the full extent of the alleged corruption.
Calls for Stronger Oversight
The case has renewed calls for stricter governance and transparency in managing Indonesia’s public conservation institutions. Beyond recovering state losses, authorities are expected to strengthen procurement oversight to ensure animal welfare is never compromised by financial misconduct.
The corruption case involving Surabaya Zoo demonstrates that weak governance can have consequences far beyond financial damage. As legal proceedings continue, the outcome is expected to shape future standards for transparency, public procurement, and wildlife management across Indonesia.
Sources: Detik (2026) , Antara (2026)
Keywords: Surabaya Zoo, Corruption Case, Animal Feed, Attorney General, Indonesia, Animal Welfare
