Debate Over Fuel Card: Regulatory Efficiency or Public Burden?

The Fuel Card 5.0 policy in Batam has sparked debate, with critics raising concerns over administrative costs, implementation clarity, and potential fuel access disruptions. Lawmakers and the public are urging the Batam government to reassess the program, citing possible inefficiencies and financial burdens on consumers.

On January 21, 2025, members of DPRD Kepulauan Riau and DPRD Batam voiced concerns over the Fuel Card 5.0 policy, questioning its administrative fees and operational feasibility. Lawmakers argue that the lack of a formal mayoral regulation (Perwako) leaves gaps in execution and enforcement. Additionally, Pertamina and Batam’s Disperindag (Department of Industry and Trade) provided differing explanations regarding the policy’s purpose and its relation to the MyPertamina QR system.

Fuel Card 5.0: A Solution or a Burden?

The Fuel Card 5.0 was introduced to regulate the distribution of subsidized fuel in Batam, but public concerns have emerged over additional costs and logistical challenges.

Administrative Fees and Public Outcry

The policy imposes a monthly administrative fee of Rp20,000 (S$1.66), sparking criticism from DPRD Batam’s Commission I Member, Ruslan Sinaga. He questioned where the funds would go and suggested Pertamina, rather than the public, should bear the costs.

DPRD Batam’s Vice Chairman Hendra Asman highlighted potential disruptions caused by the Fuel Card’s reliance on electronic systems, such as card malfunctions or machine failures, which could cause long queues at gas stations.

Overlapping Systems: Fuel Card vs. MyPertamina QR

The policy adds a second layer of control over subsidized fuel, despite the existing MyPertamina QR Code system. Critics, including DPRD Batam Chairman Muhammad Kamaluddin, argue that two separate systems may confuse the public and create unnecessary administrative hurdles.

Lack of Clear Coordination with National Authorities

Lawmakers are questioning Batam’s local government’s authority to enforce the Fuel Card system without clear directives from the Ministry of Home Affairs and BPH Migas (Indonesia’s Downstream Oil and Gas Regulatory Agency). DPRD has called for a policy review and greater transparency.

For Batam residents, the Fuel Card 5.0 could mean longer queues, added costs, and administrative confusion. Meanwhile, government agencies must address the policy’s integration with national fuel regulations to avoid overlaps and inefficiencies. The ongoing public and legislative debate may prompt policy revisions before full-scale implementation.

Sources: Batam Pos, Antara News (2025)

Keywords: Batam Fuel Card, Policy Scrutiny, Public Concerns